Talk:Battle of Cape Burnas
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg)
.svg){kind=small}
 | Text and/or other creative content from this version of Battle of Cape Burnas was copied or moved into Submarine warfare in the Black Sea campaigns (1941–42) with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
Future categories and incoming wikilinks from other articles
editWikilinks: Black Sea campaigns (1941–44), Soviet M-class submarine, List of shipwrecks in October 1942#1 October, Romanian Naval Forces#World War II and postwar, October 1942#October 1, 1942 (Thursday), Burnas Lagoon
Categories: Category:Naval battles of World War II involving Romania, Category:Naval battles of World War II involving the Soviet Union, Category:Naval battles and operations of the European theatre of World War II, Category:Military history of the Black Sea Alcherin (talk) 21:35, 28 January 2017 (UTC)
Another Romanian claim that can be disputed
editAccording Russian official POV, signs of sinking are disputed, no wreck found on alleged sinking point and there is another likely successful attack from German seaplane on 2 October. http://www.sovboat.ru/ship/m118.php3 Lupodimare89 (talk) 21:51, 20 February 2018 (UTC)
- It's again some bonkers site. I use Google Books scans to back up my """"""""""""""""claims"""""""""""""""", I'd expect you do the same if you wish to counter me. Anyway, for your sake, I won't delete. Not worth the bother. Romanian proverb: "The dog may bark but the bear walks on." Torpilorul (talk) 10:01, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
For your information, it's the most accurate database based upon the original war data campaigns with implented data of the modern-day top researcher concerning the soviet submarine operations in ww2 (Morozov and Platonov). I would stress such authors are far from being "pro-Soviets" and most of their work consisted in debunking the original Soviet claims of success scored. Google Books scans are 1) in some case not updated 2) in many case sensible to personal author political views with debatable content. Spare me insults please (not sure what is the wikipedia policy over insults but have little time to research it). Lupodimare89 (talk) 11:51, 9 April 2018 (UTC)