Battle of Cape Gloucester has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on December 26, 2023. | |||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article was created or improved during WikiProject Oceania's "10,000 Challenge", which started in November 2016 and is still continuing. You can help! |
Appropriate graphic?
editThe small inset is captioned "Cape Gloucester is on the western end of New Britain", but the graphic has neither of those things labelled. This makes it less than ideal for people not already familiar with the geography of the region. Perhaps a different map of the area, which contains labels for the key features, would help? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.45.208.237 (talk) 20:49, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
- G'day, yes this is a fair comment; however, we are constrained by what is lawfully available (i.e. in the public domain) or what our skills allow us to produce. If you can identify a better map that has an appropriate licence, we can consider using that, but in the meantime, I've adjusted the caption to provide a reference to Arawe, which is labelled. I have also asked the map's creator if they could add Cape Gloucester to the current map. They are quite busy in RL, so may not get time to do this. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 01:40, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
- Just an update on this, the file has been updated now to include Cape Gloucester. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 05:34, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Battle of Cape Gloucester. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091227222448/http://www.i-mef.usmc.mil:80/div/1tnks/History.asp to http://www.i-mef.usmc.mil/div/1tnks/History.asp
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091210202118/http://www.nps.gov:80/archive/wapa/indepth/extcontent/usmc/pcn-190-003128-00/sec6.htm to http://www.nps.gov/archive/wapa/indepth/extContent/usmc/pcn-190-003128-00/sec6.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:24, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
CE
editDid a ce, tidied the odd typo and tired sentence, moved a few sfns to sentence ends; all suggestive, rv as desired. RegardsKeith-264 (talk) 12:30, 3 February 2018 (UTC)