Talk:Battle of Changsha (1939)

The article mentions (done)

that the Japanese using poison gas was prohibited by the Geneva Protocols. The Japanese didn't sign onto the Geneva Conventions, so they did whatever they wanted to do.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.210.17.33 (talk • contribs)

Pretty much. -- Миборовский ^{U|T|C|M|E|Chugoku Banzai!} 00:09, 20 May 2006 (UTC)

I have now mentioned thet Japan hadn't signed the G.C. --Neun-x (talk) 11:01, 20 October 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Battle of Changsha (1939). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160127201950/http://lov.vac.gov.tw/Protection/Paper.aspx?i=7&c=2 to http://lov.vac.gov.tw/Protection/Paper.aspx?i=7&c=2

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:37, 28 October 2016 (UTC)

Requested move 25 July 2024

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. (non-admin closure) Waqar💬 16:40, 9 August 2024 (UTC)

---

• Battle of Changsha (1939) → First Battle of Changsha
• Battle of Changsha (1941–1942) → Third Battle of Changsha

– I am currently trying to rename four of the pages for battles called Battle of Changsha. These four articles are: Battle of Changsha (1939), Battle of Changsha (1941), Battle of Changsha (1941-1942) and Battle of Changsha (1944).

This is because these four all occurred in the Second Sino-Japanese War, so it follows naming conventions for battles like Second Battle of Alamein. Also, as there are six articles called Battle of Changsha, so the current names of these four articles are not very helpful for finding the specific battle.

However, because there is already a redirect page, I can't rename this article. Enoryt nwased lamaj (talk) 07:38, 25 July 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. The Night Watch (talk) 08:30, 1 August 2024 (UTC)

• Oppose and Restore boldly moved other articles to their previous title. There is no such thing as a "naming convention". We follow COMMONNAME and I'm not seeing any sources offered that calls them by such titles. None of these articles introduced themselves by this title and no sources are providing, so these terms appear to be terms made-up for Wikipedia. We shouldn't do that - when Wikipedia needs to invent a disambiguator, it's in parentheses, and it's best to use something objective like the year. Status quo was fine. And strongly disagree on how easy it is for a reader for "finding the specific battle" - the year is by far the most valuable bit of information here. SnowFire (talk) 19:07, 4 August 2024 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.