Talk:Battle of Edgcote
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Battle of Edgcote article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg)
Elizabeth Woodville a commoner?
editAccording to this article
...Edward had secretly been married to Elizabeth Woodville, a commoner...
But according to Elizabeth Woodville
Elizabeth was born circa 1437 at Grafton Regis, Northamptonshire, the daughter of Richard Wydeville, 1st Earl Rivers and Jacquetta of Luxembourg...
Thus her father was an earl. Moreover, according to Jacquetta of Luxembourg
Jacquetta of Luxembourg (1415/1416 – May 30, 1472) was the elder daughter of Peter I, Count of St Pol, Conversano and Brienne and his wife Margaret de Baux (Margherita del Balzo of Andria).
Thus her mother was a noblewoman as well. Also, according to Edward IV of England
...Edward then alienated Warwick by secretly marrying Elizabeth Woodville, who had a large group of relatively poor but very ambitious Lancastrian relations.
Thus Woodville was related to Lancastrian nobility. --Top.Squark (talk) 12:28, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
Earl Ryvers wasn't a Earl when they married though I recall? Therefore she is of common birth. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.145.3.82 (talk) 20:18, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
House of Lancaster involved?
editHow is house of Lancaster involved in the battle? On one side was William Herbert, who supported Edward IV for the throne, a Yorkist. On the other side was Richard Neville who supported George Plantagenet, another Yorkist. --Top.Squark (talk) 12:35, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
location: add map?
editIt certainly would enhance this article's quality if someone could add a map or two showing were in england this took place. Allsow, the question raised above(Lancaster's involvement) Is Neville really to be considered on the Lancaster side? It's a tad confusing and the article doesn't explain anything about this. --109.58.186.199 (talk) 12:46, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Battle of Edgecote Moor. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090907065536/http://www.bucks-retinue.org.uk:80/content/view/116/142/ to http://www.bucks-retinue.org.uk/content/view/116/142/
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090526025809/http://www.englishtournamentsociety.co.uk:80/ to http://www.englishtournamentsociety.co.uk/
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090526025809/http://www.englishtournamentsociety.co.uk:80/ to http://www.englishtournamentsociety.co.uk/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:53, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
Page in need of revision
editThis entry is very out of date, and does not take into account any of the research published by the Northamptonshire Battlefields Society and Battlefields Trust in the 550th anniversary year.
I am going to re-write this entry completely over the next week or so, to correct the errors and add the extra information now avaialable to us.
Graham Evans Secretary Northamptonshire Battlefields Society Trebian (talk) 09:55, 13 August 2020 (UTC)