Talk:Battle of Fréteval/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk · contribs) 13:08, 4 July 2017 (UTC)

Will take this one. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 13:08, 4 July 2017 (UTC)

@Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi: Extremely sorry for the delay. Will complete this soon. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 14:34, 4 August 2017 (UTC)

• Lead and infobox;
  • Please add an infobox to the article to increase the readability, you may use: {{Infobox military conflict}}

[1] applies.

• • Fix the link syntax here: Philip Augustus, from a twelth-century French manuscript in the Bibliotheque Nationale

Done, well spotted.

• Section 1;
  • For over a "an" year

Negative.

• • John had made Philip large grants from Richard's Duchy of Aquitaine; please rephrase to improve the readability

Good catch, done.

• • King Richard I of England; dup-link

Well, per MOS:DUPLINK there's no harm in a repetition for the first occurance following the lede, and if you want to removed the duplink to Rich, you presumable also want to rm the same to Philip. Either way, I'm easy.

• Section 2;
  • soaked through- 'a condition which delighted Richard'^[18]- after; use mdash

I agree it was a crappy sentence generally; If you don't mind, I've re-worded and tightened it.

• Section 3; all good
• 0% confidence, violation unlikely.

Well-written, sorry for the delay. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 12:13, 20 August 2017 (UTC)

---

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 13:19, 27 August 2017 (UTC)