Talk:Battle of Goychay/GA2
Latest comment: 4 years ago by CPA-5 in topic GA Review
GA Review
edit| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: CPA-5 (talk · contribs) 10:51, 26 September 2019 (UTC)
Claim my seat here. Cheers. CPA-5 (talk) 10:51, 26 September 2019 (UTC)
- The Battle of Goychay (Azerbaijani: Göyçay döyüşü, Russian: Геокчайский бой, Turkish: Göyçay/Gökçay Savaşı) or Raid on Goychay (Azerbaijani: Göyçay basqını, Turkish: Göyçay/Gökçay Baskını) Unlink both Russian and Turkish languages.
- operation to prevent the Ottoman army from recovering in Ganja --> "operation to prevent the Ottoman Army from recovering in Ganja" Pipe Ottoman Army to the Ottoman Army (1861–1922).
- Red Army is overlinked.
- but Mustafa Görüryılmaz notes that in reality Is there a link for Mustafa Görüryılmaz?
- fight against the Ottoman-Azerbaijani coalition forces Unlink Azerbaijani.
- led by Osman Bey, was sent to the Garamaryam front Link of Osman Bey?
- Islamic Army of the Caucasus in Myusyuslyu, Nazım Bey Link Nazım Bey?
- the 28th Battalion was caught in a Soviet ambush having failed to take timely measures --> "the 28th Battalion were caught in a Soviet ambush having failed to take timely measures"
- The 29th Battalion, which was attacked from both sides, was able to move to the village of Veysalli after a very bloody fight --> "The 29th Battalion, were attacked from both sides, were able to move to the village of Veysalli after a very bloody fight"
- neither side was able to defeat the other in the hot summer weather --> "neither side were able to defeat the other in the hot summer weather"
- the double envelopment maneuver used by the Ottoman army in such battles was not applied --> "the double envelopment manoeuvre used by the Ottoman Army in such battles were not applied"
- According to reports, Bolshevik Red Army forces had burned down American burned.
- were able to recruit Armenians and Russians from surrounding Unlink Russians because of common term.
- the Islamic army of the Caucasus after its formation --> "the Islamic Army of the Caucasus after their formation"
- disappointment to the public in a speech given in the town center American center.
- the 5th Caucasus Infantry Division was preparing for its first combined operation in Azerbaijan --> "the 5th Caucasus Infantry Division were preparing for their first combined operation in Azerbaijan" and unlink Azerbaijan.
- while the 2nd Cavalry Regiment was going to attack the Bolsheviks --> "while the 2nd Cavalry Regiment were going to attack the Bolsheviks"
- of about a thousand troops, two cannons and two machine guns American plural form of cannon.
- but were fully defeated by 7:00 AM --> "but were fully defeated by 7:00 am"
- The 9th Caucasian Regiment, which was stationed in Poylu --> "The 9th Caucasian Regiment, were stationed in Poylu"
- which consisted of less than 10 thousand soldiers --> "which consisted of less than ten thousand soldiers" in the note.
- The coalition force seized the Syghyr Station on 10 June Change force to forces.
- advantage of this situation, which was favorable to the Baku commissioner American favorable.
Infobox
- "27 June – 1 July 1918 (4 days)" Place the days below the date.
- "35,000 (including Dashnak groups)" Same as above try to make "(including Dashnak groups)" below the strength.
- Who's the later of the Soviet Russians?
Images
- Why is File:Battle of Goychay plan.jpg in PD? The date part of the images means the original date.
- File:Ottoman soldier in Azerbaijan.png Same as above. BTW if the author is unknown how do we know it is in PD in the US?
- File:Azeri army soldiers.jpg There should be a US tag same with the other images if they are in PD.
- Try to avoid. If you click on the images File:Rushdi Pasha.jpg and File:Stepan Shaumyan.jpg then you'll go to their articles.
- Also try to have links to the sources in images who're in PD.
Sources
- Ref 1, translate the title.
- Birinci Dünya hərbində Türk hərbi, Qafqaz cəbhəsi, III ordu hərəkatı is it a book? If it then place it to the "Sources" section also why doesn't it have no link or book code?
- Ref 7 has no link.
- Ref 18 needs a translated title.
- Süleymanov's source needs an access-date. And translate its title. Same with all foreign languages in the "Source" section.
- Remove David Allen, William Edward; Muratoff, Paul's book's link and the archive because we only need the book code and a Google Books' URL if they give us a preview.
- "Göyçay və Cavad qəzalarında erməni vəhşilikləri"'s link is dead.
That's anything I think there is a hope of work in the sources and the images but I think it can pass it these comments are addressed. Cheers. CPA-5 (talk) 19:45, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
- Comments
Text
Removed both links. All languages were shown with templates, so I removed the templates too.- Fixed. Changed naming and the link.
- Fixed. Left only one link to the Red Army.
You mean a Wikipedia article? No, there is no Wikipedia article of Görüryılmaz. There is a page dedicated to him in kitapyurdu and biyografi. He seems encyclopedic enough, I actually can create an article about him.- Fixed. I was confused when writing this article. I really didn't knew who could Osman Bey could be. I linked him with Topal Osman. He fought in Caucasus and was a Yarbay, just like the Osman Bey in the article. It seems like he is referred to as Osman Bey in some sources.
There is no Wikipedia article for Nazım Bey. His full name is . There are articles about him in University of Ankara and DergiPark.- Fixed.
- Fixed.
- Fixed.
- Fixed.
- Fixed.
- Changed it to Russians in Azerbaijan.
- Fixed.
- Fixed.
- Fixed.
- Fixed.
- Fixed.
- Fixed.
- Fixed.
- Fixed.
- Fixed.
- Fixed.
Infobox
- Fixed.
- Fixed.
Russian SFSR and Baku Commune were different things. The latter was independent of Russian SFSR, its close ally.
- @Solavirum: I'm sorry for the confusion but I meant "who's the leader of the Soviet Russian forces?". Sorry for the confusion. Cheers. CPA-5 (talk) 19:48, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
- @CPA-5:, I added Sergey Kirov for now, per my history teacher, but I will research it deeper and try to find a better variant. Cheers. --► Sincerely: SolaVirum 16:37, 17 October 2019 (UTC)
Images
- It is a battle plan, drawn during the battle (1918). The PD date is January 1, 1924 in US.
- It's author is unknown. The image was published in a state-sponsored encyclopedia. The image itself was most likely in the state archives.
- Fixed.
- Fixed. Removed links.
- Fixed. Added links.
Sources
- Fixed.
- Fixed. I actually had such a hard time finding this book.
On hold I don't think I'd be able to find this that easily. I don't even think a URL exist for it. It was published in 1990, Azerbaijan wasn't even independent back then. There is no special link for it. A mention of issue of "tarix, fəlsəfə, hüquq seriyası" published in 1990 exists in here. It clearly exists, but not in the web. I might need to dig in on this topic IRL. But I don't even know if they would even let me in due to my age.- Fixed.
- Fixed.
- Fixed.
- @CPA-5:, took a bit of a time, but I finally ended my work on the issues you addressed. Hope it's okay. Cheers bud! --► Sincerely: SolaVirum 11:14, 28 September 2019 (UTC)
- @CPA-5 and Solavirum:. Hi how are we going with this. AIRcorn (talk) 07:24, 1 December 2019 (UTC)
- @Aircorn:, hello there! Well, nearly everything is done, except for this one (I don't think I'd be able to find this that easily. I don't even think a URL exist for it. It was published in 1990, Azerbaijan wasn't even independent back then. There is no special link for it. A mention of issue of "tarix, fəlsəfə, hüquq seriyası" published in 1990 exists in here. It clearly exists, but not in the web. I might need to dig in on this topic IRL. But I don't even know if they would even let me in due to my age.). I will try to get this done this week. --► Sincerely: SolaVirum 12:46, 1 December 2019 (UTC)
- Hey Solavirum. Good to hear. CPA has a few outstanding lagging reviews and I have left a personal message at their talk page seeing how they are going with these. If they don't get back to this one and you think it is right give me a ping and I can have a look for you. AIRcorn (talk) 17:44, 1 December 2019 (UTC)
- @Aircorn: and @CPA-5:, I deleted the ref in question, as I could not get access to the library. This was it, I think we can conclude this. --► Sincerely: SolaVirum 15:18, 27 December 2019 (UTC)
- @Aircorn: and @CPA-5:, actually forget that. My acquaintance was able to get the actual copy, and I converted it into PDF. Everything is done! --► Sincerely: SolaVirum 14:24, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
- @Solavirum: Aha that sounds good to hear now I believe the title needs to be translated and maybe a "|language=" template here. It looks like it is written in Cyrillic but in which language if I can ask you that question? I hope we finally can promote it before New Year. Cheers. CPA-5 (talk) 10:54, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
- @CPA-5:, done. It is in Azerbaijani, which used Cyrillic alphabet from 1938 to 1991. Cheers! --► Sincerely: SolaVirum 15:50, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
- All right now we finaly can promote it and a happy New Year. Cheers. CPA-5 (talk) 15:52, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
- Hey Solavirum. Good to hear. CPA has a few outstanding lagging reviews and I have left a personal message at their talk page seeing how they are going with these. If they don't get back to this one and you think it is right give me a ping and I can have a look for you. AIRcorn (talk) 17:44, 1 December 2019 (UTC)