Talk:Battle of Groningen

Latest comment: 8 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Confusion regarding strength

edit

I'm confused. The "forces involved" section only mentions 2nd Canadian Infantry Division, yet the "strength" section lists 9 brigades. Canadian divisions (both infantry and armoured) were composed of 3 brigades (each in turn comprised of 3 battalions). Could one or the other please be clarified? Based on my maps of the Holland Campaign, my guess would be that this should likely be changed to "9 battalions", as no other Canadian division was near the 2nd at this point (the 4th Armoured & 3rd Infantry being to the east, while the 1st Infantry & 5th Armoured were to the east). Cam (Chat) 07:18, 29 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Battle of Groningen. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:45, 28 October 2016 (UTC)Reply