Talk:Battle of Hama

Latest comment: 8 years ago by Catlemur in topic GA Review
Good articleBattle of Hama has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
January 12, 2016Good article nomineeListed
On this day...Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on November 29, 2018, November 29, 2021, and November 29, 2022.

GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Battle of Hama/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Catlemur (talk · contribs) 22:31, 8 January 2016 (UTC)Reply


Looks interesting.Review comments coming soon.--Catlemur (talk) 22:31, 8 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

  • "When a servant was sent to buy provisions in the village, he aroused the suspicions of the locals with their strange dress and manner, who notified a local official, Abu Khubzah."

This sentence seems a bit confusing.

  • Perhaps the strengths and casualties of the battle can be incorporated into the infobox.
Hello Catlemur, and thanks for taking the time to review this. I was waiting until you finish the review so I could deal with your suggestions at once. Are you done? Constantine 21:25, 10 January 2016 (UTC)Reply
Constantine I did not find any else to point out so you can start.--Catlemur (talk) 21:27, 10 January 2016 (UTC)Reply
Hi Catlemur, I think I've dealt with your suggestions, and I've added a few more details on the preliminaries of the battle. Cheers, Constantine 22:53, 11 January 2016 (UTC)Reply
Constantine Great job.I gave it GA status.--Catlemur (talk) 14:53, 12 January 2016 (UTC)Reply