Talk:Battle of Hereford

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Herefordshire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Herefordshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HerefordshireWikipedia:WikiProject HerefordshireTemplate:WikiProject HerefordshireHerefordshire articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Anglo-Saxon Kingdoms Low‑importance

	Anglo-Saxon England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anglo-Saxon Kingdoms, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Anglo-Saxon Kingdoms on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Anglo-Saxon KingdomsWikipedia:WikiProject Anglo-Saxon KingdomsTemplate:WikiProject Anglo-Saxon KingdomsAnglo-Saxon Kingdoms articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wales Low‑importance

	Wales portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wales, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Wales on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WalesWikipedia:WikiProject WalesTemplate:WikiProject WalesWales articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Dyfnwal ap Tewdwr

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

The link to Dyfnwal ap Tewdwr connects to a 6th century leader of the Strathclyde Welsh rather than ap Tewdwr. It needs amending but I haven't the knowledge to edit the page.

81.111.91.183 (talk) 10:20, 3 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

The man is Dumnagual III of Alt Clut, a far-off king of Strathclyde, but I don't think he belongs in this article. Sure his death may have took place in 760, the year of the battle, but the cited webpage doesn't actually state he took part in the hostilities [1]. Seems like an editor may have just assumed he did. I'm removing him. Thanks for leaving a note.--Brianann MacAmhlaidh (talk) 23:21, 4 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Add topic