Talk:Battle of Jarama

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Untitled

edit

This article seems to have a number of issues, which may be the result of typographical errors, or of misreadings. An initial reading of it reveals the following (in no particular order): There was no XVIIIth International Brigade, either at the Jarama or subsequently. Historians recognise five in all, numbered consecutively from XI to XV, with some other formations never existing for long enough to be included in the official order of battle (that said, I have never heard of an 18th International Brigade existing in any form.) The British Battalion was part of the XVth International Brigade (as the song quoted in the article states) and not as the body of the article says. The idea that any of the International Brigades were armoured formations, or even had armoured elements, is not borne out in any of the sources. It is also not in keeping with the doctirne prevailing at the time and any co-operation that did take place betwen armoured units and the Brigades was on a battle by battle basis and not, as the article suggests, a result of the units being integrated armoured formations (as such things did not actually exist in the Popular Army of the Second Spanish Republic at this or, to my knowledge, at any other time. These are just those errors that I have noticed after a relatively cursory reading of this piece. I am not sure how they could have arisen, given that the sources quoted are those from which I would have drwan much of my information, and do not contain the errors of which the article is guilty. I am not familiar enough with the system or technology of Wikipedia to, I feel, get as fully involved in the correction of errors such as those that I have highlighted above. Perhaps somone more "au fait" with such things could edit this article? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.134.246.111 (talk) 06:06, 10 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Battle of Jarama. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:23, 28 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Battle of Jarama. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:43, 16 July 2017 (UTC)Reply