Talk:Battle of Jitra

Latest comment: 8 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

A couple of suggestions

edit

Good work so far, I have the following suggestions for improvement:

  • is there a page number fo the The War in Malaya citation?
  • more precision citations of the Smith and Wigmore works would help aid verifiability, for instance individual page numbers could be cited
  • are there any images that could be added?
  • the Jeffreys and Anderson work doesn't seem to be cited specifically. If possible inline citations to it should be added;
  • I've added citation needed tags where I feel they are needed to bring this article up to B class. Once this has been done, feel free to request re-assessment at WP:MHA. Cheers, AustralianRupert (talk) 22:42, 4 March 2011 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Battle of Jitra. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:27, 28 October 2016 (UTC)Reply