Talk:Battle of Kalavrye

Battle of Kalavrye is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.

This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on February 19, 2016.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
September 27, 2010	Good article nominee	Listed
October 30, 2010	WikiProject A-class review	Approved
December 5, 2015	Featured article candidate	Promoted
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on September 2, 2010. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that in the Battle of Kalavrye, the Alexios Komnenos rallied his scattered army, counterattacked, and drew the numerically superior enemy army into a successful ambush?
Current status: Featured article

Military history: Balkan / European / Roman & Byzantine / Medieval

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Balkan military history task force (c. 500–present)
	European military history task force
	Roman and Byzantine military history task force
	Medieval warfare task force (c. 500 – c. 1500)

Additional information:
/
	This article has passed an A-Class review.

Middle Ages Low‑importance

	Middle Ages portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Greece: Byzantine Low‑importance

	Greece portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greece, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greek history on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GreeceWikipedia:WikiProject GreeceTemplate:WikiProject GreeceGreek articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Byzantine world task force.

GA Review

Latest comment: 14 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

This review is transcluded from Talk:Battle of Kalavrye/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 22:38, 26 September 2010 (UTC) GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteriaReply

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality:

B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
A couple of refs need place of publication
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources:

B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

C. No original research:
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects:

B. Focused:
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias:
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc:
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
Nice graphics, but the labels and colors don't match.
Overall:
Pass or Fail:

Doh! I feel stupid for the colour label thing. Fixed now, and added the usual locations in sources. What exactly is the problem with 2A? Constantine ✍ 01:21, 27 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Nothing, just one I missed checking off.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 01:31, 27 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Section heading howler

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

It's been miserable here weatherwise for the last few days, so I need something to cheer me up. This article (the featured one for today, Friday 19th February 2016) fits the bill perfectly. The text for the article has apparently been transcluded from some other website, but the process has missed the wonderful schoolboy howler in the 4th heading "After Maths". This should, of course, read "Aftermath", but PLEASE, Wikipedians, PLEASE, can we keep the original in? lol

  In my (happy) schooldays, after Maths we usually had either Geography or Latin, if memory serves me well. Got your primer ready? Shall we have a quick translation test? RaynesParkGuy (talk) 10:21, 19 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

UPDATE - Oh no, someone's corrected the howler while I was writing my original comment! Well spotted, whoever you are - spoilsport! RaynesParkGuy (talk) 10:25, 19 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Add topic