This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Battle of Kambula article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Ensured that the article is within project scope, tagged for task forces, and assessed for class. --Rosiestep (talk) 00:08, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Battle of Kambula. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050312111439/http://www.anglozuluwar.co.za:80/battle-of-khambula.htm to http://www.anglozuluwar.co.za/battle-of-khambula.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071020034342/http://www.travellersimpressions.com/process/articlepage.php?storycode=rg0007 to http://www.travellersimpressions.com/process/articlepage.php?storycode=rg0007
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070930204250/http://www.historynet.com/historical_conflicts/3026636.html to http://www.historynet.com/historical_conflicts/3026636.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:32, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
Revision
editAdded missing citations, expanded and revised several sections, auto edded, Br English, checked for dupe wikilinks, completed citations, fud dup etc. Keith-264 (talk) 12:59, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks for the quick review and ce, I was rushing to get it done and missed the typos etc despite a second reading. Regards Keith-264 (talk) 19:11, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
- There's plenty more to do to improve the article but at least it's out of the doldrums. Keith-264 (talk) 19:14, 16 July 2019 (UTC)