Talk:Battle of Karanovasa
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Battle of Karanovasa article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It is requested that an image or photograph of Battle of Karanovasa be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible. Wikipedians in the following regions may be able to help:
|
It is requested that a map or maps be included in this article to improve its quality. Wikipedians in Romania or Turkey may be able to help! |
Untitled
editWhy does everyone add such huge Turkish numbers!? There is no information about the Ottoman numbers in any books! It shall therfore be "Unknown".
Ensured that the article is within project scope, tagged for task forces, and assessed for class. --Rosiestep (talk) 00:30, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Battle of Karanovasa. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070312232251/http://www.lumeam.ro:80/nr1_2003/pagini_de_istorie.html to http://www.lumeam.ro/nr1_2003/pagini_de_istorie.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:34, 28 October 2016 (UTC)