Talk:Battle of Katia/GA2

GA Reassessment

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

• At the moment the article is going through an edit war
• The accuracy of the article is disputed

Both these points while minor, fail the Good Article criteria. I have put this revierw on hold for seven days, to see if this can be resolved. Jim Sweeney (talk) 02:49, 26 November 2011 (UTC)

The accuracy of the article is NOT disputed. The accuracy of the name of the article is disputed. According to WP:COMMONNAME the name of this article should reflect the reliable references used to edit it, as it did when it was awarded a GA. But those who wish to dispute the guidelines in WP:COMMONNAME and put a consensus of personal opinions higher than relevant references, have taken over this article. It can't be a good article while it is called a battle. --Rskp (talk) 04:45, 26 November 2011 (UTC)

Without any further discussion the article with 'battle' in the title has been reinstated as a GA article despite an ongoing dispute regarding the name. How can that be?--Rskp (talk) 03:11, 27 November 2011 (UTC)

It has never been delisted, thats what this is for. Jim Sweeney (talk) 03:58, 27 November 2011 (UTC)

Well, it appeared to have been - for a time. --Rskp (talk) 06:19, 28 November 2011 (UTC)

No I have checked the history and it has never been deleted. Jim Sweeney (talk) 13:18, 28 November 2011 (UTC)

Closed now seems stable Jim Sweeney (talk) 12:54, 5 December 2011 (UTC)