Talk:Battle of Komsomolskoye

Kakiyev?

This is new to me. Guess his men were not included in casualties?

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 3 external links on Battle of Komsomolskoye. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090425180548/http://users.jyu.fi:80/~aphamala/pe/issue2/sanobar.htm to http://users.jyu.fi/~aphamala/pe/issue2/sanobar.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070715051343/http://www.hrw.org/press/2000/03/chech0324.htm to http://hrw.org/press/2000/03/chech0324.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20061122205709/http://www.jamestown.org/publications_details.php?volume_id=23&issue_id=1743&article_id=16984 to http://www.jamestown.org/publications_details.php?volume_id=23&issue_id=1743&article_id=16984

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 22:59, 22 February 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Battle of Komsomolskoye. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110127175756/http://www.lenta.ru/vojna/2000/03/20/gelaev/stat.htm to http://www.lenta.ru/vojna/2000/03/20/gelaev/stat.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121017072230/http://www.unhcr.org/refworld/publisher%2CHRW%2CCOUNTRYREP%2CRUS%2C3ae6a7ff8%2C0.html to http://www.unhcr.org/refworld/publisher%2CHRW%2CCOUNTRYREP%2CRUS%2C3ae6a7ff8%2C0.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:06, 16 July 2017 (UTC)

Four days of artillery prep

The article says: "After four days of around-the-clock artillery bombardment, with fighter-bomber air strikes being conducted every five to 10 minutes <...> the storming of Komsomolskoye began". This is a modified quote from the Army article (which is itself a bit chaotic in its record of the battle). But the Army article does not state anywhere that the described artillery strikes were kept up for four days specifically, or preceded the assault. Instead, the back-and-forth troop movements, artillery/air strikes, and mopping-up missions were intermittent throughout the battle, with skirmishes, counterattacks, breakout attempts, a ceasefire etc.

So, this introductory sentence sounds good as a Warhammer-like story (and is probably lifted from a dramatized article), but it quickly makes the rest of the dry, actual description confusing, because the battle was not structured in this way and stretched over many confusing days. In fact, as far as I can gather, participants were bitter that the fire support was not enough (which led to losses in unsuccessful infantry attacks), the escalation of force was too slow, the perimeter blockade was extremely permeable, and the decisive push was achieved too late to finish off the Gelayev main force.

(Frankly, the Army article is far from an ideal source overall. It looks more like a collection of quotes from media articles and bold conjectures like this: "While we know little as to the exact casualty figures, it is most likely - given the experience, motivation, and tenacity of the Chechens, and the comparative inexperience of Russian units employed - that the Russian losses were several times those of the defenders." Even the most liberal, damning version of Federal complete losses (~450 combatants) in a highly critical sources, is less than the insurgent total losses.) AyeBraine (talk) 04:30, 24 May 2019 (UTC)