Talk:Battle of Lipnic
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Battle of Lipnic article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Khan's name
editThere was no such khan at this time. It was Ahmed Khan who ruled the Great Horde at this time. Please check your sources.
At the same time Ahmed had brother Mamed (just like in the joke Ahmed/Mamed) (Maxmud of Astrakhan), whose name could have been transliterated into Mamad/Mamat, which may be corrupted into Mamak (which is absolutely not a turkic hame).
`'mikkanarxi 17:00, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
- Yes, it was probably him. I only put the name how it appears in a Moldavian chronicle, and made a footnote with variants of his name. I too looked to see who exactly was this khan, but I couldn`t find anything. So yes, it`s probably Ahmed Khan. Anyway, I didn`t make it up... So, should I put Ahmed Khan instead of Mamay? Greier 19:14, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
"Stephen the Great" article must probably mention the battle. `'mikkanarxi 00:29, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
Verifiability problem
editThe article cites only historical sources. It lloks like someone just translates a text from some historic book without providing reference to it. I seriousl doubt the contributor read Dlugsz and Sarnicki and ... `'mikkanarxi 17:04, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
- Look at the bottom of the page, there is a section called, surprisingly, "Footnotes and references". There is a link there, if you can read, this one where there are all the sources (in Romanian). For example, since we were talking about the name of the khan (and since somebody removed the footnote about his name), click on this link, press F3 while you`re there, and look for the words "Mamiak" or "Moniak" or "Manyak".... Greier 19:07, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
- OK. You have read them. Still, this constitutes original research, to write article basing on ancient chronicles. And this case is a perfect confirmation. The fact is that at these times there was a totally different khan in the Horde. And yes, I know how to use google. I have no idea who translated Dlugosz into Romanian and from which langauge, and how maany translation mistakes is in this text. Primary sources are good for quotations, but to have an article about the battle, an expert must read historical docs, sift out bullshit and spelling/transliteration problems, publish it into a reputable source, and only then you must write a wikipedia article. `'mikkanarxi 23:16, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
Now v. not
editOne note begins "It is now known…" but then runs off into conjecture. Does it perhaps mean to say "It is not known…"? - Jmabel | Talk 22:58, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
Also "or does a wrong due to him" is quite unclear, including the referent of "him". - Jmabel | Talk 23:00, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Battle of Lipnic. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061114112449/http://www.stefancelmare.ro:80/izvoare.htm to http://www.stefancelmare.ro/izvoare.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:23, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
Battaglia di lipnic
editBattaglia di lipnic 151.35.159.179 (talk) 14:20, 26 October 2022 (UTC)