Talk:Battle of Maaloula

WARNING: ACTIVE COMMUNITY SANCTIONS

The article Battle of Maaloula, along with other pages relating to the Syrian Civil War and ISIL, is designated by the community as a contentious topic. The current restrictions are:

Limit of one revert in 24 hours: This article is under WP:1RR (one revert per editor per article per 24-hour period)

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be sanctioned.

Remedy instructions and exemptions

Enforcement procedures:

Violations of any restrictions (excluding 1RR/reverting violations) and other conduct issues should be reported to the administrators' incidents noticeboard. Violations of revert restrictions should be reported to the administrators' edit warring noticeboard.
Editors who violate any listed restrictions may be blocked by any uninvolved administrator, even on a first offense.
An editor must be aware before they can be sanctioned.

With respect to any reverting restrictions:

Edits made solely to enforce any clearly established consensus are exempt from all edit-warring restrictions. In order to be considered "clearly established" the consensus must be proven by prior talk-page discussion.
Edits made which remove or otherwise change any material placed by clearly established consensus, without first obtaining consensus to do so, may be treated in the same manner as clear vandalism.
Clear vandalism of any origin may be reverted without restriction.
Reverts of edits made by anonymous (IP) editors that are not vandalism are exempt from the 1RR but are subject to the usual rules on edit warring. If you are in doubt, contact an administrator for assistance.

If you are unsure if your edit is appropriate, discuss it here on this talk page first. Remember: When in doubt, don't revert!

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Battle of Maaloula article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Military history: Middle East

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Middle Eastern military history task force

Syria Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Syria, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Syria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SyriaWikipedia:WikiProject SyriaTemplate:WikiProject SyriaSyria articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Latest comment: 11 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

why does it say a christian town? the town is half muslims half christian and there is at least one mosque. most of the muslims there are locals who converted to islam but retained their Aramaic language thats why maloula along with its muslims neighbours bakhaa and jibdeen still speak aramaic — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.47.190.241 (talk) 01:27, 13 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

funny that you would claim the town for islam after everyone there evacuates. what benefit would a muslim or islamic group gain from speaking aramaic? is there an aramaic qur'an? why is that more interesting than an aramaic targum? 173.14.238.118 (talk) 02:53, 15 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

Ongoing

Latest comment: 10 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

Rebel forces retook the city. Part of the same battle or a different one? Coltsfan (talk) 13:14, 7 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Interesting question. Probably we'll have to wait for external sources to determine it is one way or the other. Apdency (talk) 18:37, 8 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

There was three major battles in this city, and probably there is a fourth to come (the government will counter attack soon). I would say it's unwise to create a article for every battle fought there. Coltsfan (talk) 22:35, 8 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

And the government retook Maloula. It's the fourth time the city change hands in one year. Shouldn't that be in the article? Coltsfan (talk) 17:12, 18 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Battle of Ma'loula. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:35, 28 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Add topic