Talk:Battle of Marciano

Latest comment: 8 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Gian Giacomo Medici

edit

I'm not sure whether the most common form of his name encountered in historical works is "Medici", "Marignano", or "Meghedino"; but we should really choose one and stick with it throughout the article, as switching among three different ways of referring to the same person is quite confusing for the reader. Kirill Lokshin 20:04, 25 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

The "Lost Leonardo"

edit

Perhaps there should be more of a mention of the painting: The Battle of Scannagallo by Giorgio Vasari. There is evidence that a "Lost painting by Leonardo di Vinci" is behind it. ~Eric F 184.76.225.106 (talk) 05:57, 16 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Battle of Marciano. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:43, 28 October 2016 (UTC)Reply