Talk:Battle of Medina

	Mexico portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mexico, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Mexico on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MexicoWikipedia:WikiProject MexicoTemplate:WikiProject MexicoMexico articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

United States: Texas High‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Texas portal This article is supported by WikiProject Texas (assessed as High-importance).

Military history: European / North America / Spanish C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	European military history task force
	North American military history task force
	Spanish military history task force

Decisive victory

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Regarding the constant change lately of the outcome section of the infobox:

The long-ish standing battle outcome stated in the infobox of this article, "decisive victory," has ample evidence to call it such. The Republicans lost 93% of their force, the few survivors were unable to regroup or become a viable force afterward, and some didn't stop running until they reached Louisiana. Also, the word "decisive" is certainly not required to be used in and of itself in any reference used. Words in sources such as "soundly" or "overwhelmingly" serve the same purpose. Per BLUE, the battle was a decisive victory. GenQuest ^{"Talk to Me"} 16:11, 27 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Add topic