Talk:Battle of Mišar
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg)
Decisive victory
editIt is not problem to find reliable scholarly sources that battles of Mišar, Deligrad and siege of Belgrade were big Serbian victories in 1806. But I don't like the way {{fact}} is used. If everyone puts it with no explanation for things that are well known even for layperson or for things that can easily (easily = in less then 10 seconds) been checked via Google, Wikipedia will turn into hell. BTW, here English scholarly sources are. -- Bojan Talk 06:44, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
- If it is easy to find reliable sources for this battle then by all means add them. In the meantime the article makes claims that are very hard to believe. For instance a victory against ten times the numbers would be an extraordinary event and would needs to be well backed up to be taken seriously. Dejvid (talk) 16:51, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
I don't get it, what war crimes?Guess you Western historians didn't wrote 'bout George Washington's war crimes, when he under command of British crown killed a fortress full of children, women and old man... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.101.75.212 (talk) 12:37, 5 March 2013 (UTC) You think English scholars or person writing on Google were there during First Serbian uprise...Why don't you write bout war crimes Muslims comited against Christians from XIV to XIX century, how they impaled people, and how Mišar battle was done because ordinary Christians could not handle five centuries genocide done by Muslims...I thought wikipedia is independent source, but I see you are nothing but those kind of people who write as they are payed...You always cittate Western scholars, and are not interested in other world opinion...I agree that you gave me a lot of valluble information, but then again you are a Western product... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.87.131.155 (talk) 19:55, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Ambiguous date.
editIt is unknown if the date in the article is O.S or N.S. Should we precise or is the date meant to be in the N.S ? Maxime12346 (talk) 17:20, 1 December 2022 (UTC)