Talk:Battle of Novara (1849)
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Battle of Novara (1849) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on March 22, 2007, March 22, 2008, and March 22, 2009. |
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Battle of Novara (1849). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051125112304/http://battaglianovara1849.interfree.it:80/ to http://battaglianovara1849.interfree.it/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:33, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
Also according to Michael Embree's Radetzky's Marches: The Campaigns of 1848 and 1849 in Upper Italy, there were also large numbers of stragglers (approximately 20,000) for the Piedmontese side after total of 9 hours fighting in Novara. Although many of them did return, those who didn't after commited riots, missing and captured, and in addition the dead soldiers buried by the opponent were not counted, as the difficulties of counting the loss of a defeated army were stressed in Relazioni e rapporti 1849, pp.648-649. As to the wounded, the Piedmontese Military Sanitary Corps initially reported attending over 2500 on the battlefield, however this figure was subsequently altered to 3008. La Masson put the total Piedmontese losses as 4000 wounded and killed with 2000 either missing or captured. As for the Austrian side, Michael Embree noted that many of the missing numbers as given by Hilleprandt "1849" P. 268, including one officer and 876 NCOs and men could have been taken prisoners as D'Aspre's II Corps sustained considerable casualties in first 5 hours of intense fight until reinforcement of III corps arrived after 15:00 that day. Also the number of dead for the Austrian side ranged from 410 to 797 (Embree checked Viviani's consideration in this regard).
Michael Embree's book should be used
editAccording to Michael Embree's Radetzky's Marches: The Campaigns of 1848 and 1849 in Upper Italy, the wounded being rescued by Piedmont Sanitory Corps from the battle were initially 2500 and later revisied to 3008 being admitted to hospitals after the battle (Austrian about 1800), and the losses for the losing side are very difficult to calculate. In addition, his book has taken from many and varied sources, including a considerable number of contemporary and first-hand accounts, as well official reports from all sides. 2604:3D09:D07F:E580:0:0:0:766E (talk) 14:33, 13 March 2024 (UTC)