Talk:Battle of Palmdale

Latest comment: 6 years ago by L293D in topic Article Name
edit

In the "Incident" section of this page regarding "Battle of Palmdale", there is a reference to one of the pilots involved, a 1st LT Hans Einstein and the hyperlink takes the viewer to the Wikipedia page of a vastly different "Hans Einstein." Recommend the hyperlink in the "Battle of Palmdale" page be deactivated. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 146.79.254.10 (talk) 16:58, 25 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

Not sure who added the link, but it's fixed now, Thanks Samf4u (talk) 02:48, 26 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

contemporary refs

edit

Of all the references cited in this article, only one is from the time of the incident, and it is used only once, for a statement about the fires caused. Were there no other 1956 sources? Did the Air Force hush the incident up? If so, this should be noted in the article. --Piledhigheranddeeper (talk) 19:16, 25 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

While researching this article I found no other references from 1956 and no evidence of a cover up. Samf4u (talk) 17:20, 19 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

Outcome

edit

The article ends with the drone crashing and the rockets causing wildfires. Did the incident result in any repercussions for the pilots or the Air Force? In particular the failure to shoot down a slow-moving drone must have been embarrassing. Did the Air Force consider re-equipping the F-89 with cannon? -Ashley Pomeroy (talk) 19:43, 20 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

I'm sure the incident was an embarrassment for the Air Force and I imaging some changes were made but during all the research for this article I never read anything concerning these points. Samf4u (talk) 11:44, 22 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Battle of Palmdale. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:44, 28 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Article Name

edit

Shouldn't this article be renamed to "Palmdale incident", as, according to Wikipedia, a battle is a "a combat in warfare between two or more armed forces, or combatants" and this incident is obviously not a combat in warfare? L293D (talk | contributions) 02:12, 5 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Per this source, "Battle of Palmdale" appears to be the Common Name for the incident. - BilCat (talk) 11:56, 5 January 2018 (UTC)Reply
I see. I researched a bit more and it effectively appears that it was called "Battle of Palmdale" rather than "Palmdale incident". L293D (talk | contributions) 14:41, 5 January 2018 (UTC)Reply