Wikipedia

Talk:Battle of Panjwaii

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified
Learn more about this page

Untitled

edit
Latest comment: 11 years ago9 comments4 people in discussion

Fixed up some of the phrasing of the article. Made it a little more articulate. Also fixed the formatting of the page with the rearrangement of the article and warbox. Good article though, just needs some expansion. Is there a way to add this article to the links of battles available in the 2001 war in Afghanistan campaign box. It currently isn't available.--Arsenous Commodore 22:29, 10 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

I took out several references to the word "Canadian". The article makes it clear at the beginning who the primary coalition force was in this instance, so using the word "Canadian" often twice in the same sentence is a little cumbersome. ComaDivine 11:31, 2 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

How do I put this battle into the "war box" that includes battles like tora bora, anaconda, mountain thrust......etc? Hellopple 3:27, 2 December 2006

The Campaignbox, you mean. It has to be changed on the actual template, which is here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Campaignbox_U.S._Invasion_of_Afghanistan

Before you add this battle - note that it was a part of Operation Medusa, which is already listed. ComaDivine 00:49, 3 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Nice addition of pictures, spruced up the article. My earlier question coincided with Hellopple, I'm glad to see that it's now included. And also thanks for the answer Coma.--Arsenous Commodore 15:18, 6 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Oh, that was me... Hellopple... I had just forgotten to add my screenname to the post. Thanks for compliments. User:Hellopple 3:50 atlantic, 6 December (UTC)

I have added a few sections including Post Medusa combat, OP Falcon Summit, and Spring fighting to the article. What does anyone think of it? User:Hellopple

Excellent job Hellopple! Any expansion is always good. And this is definitely a good addition of segments. I have heard that Canada will be taking part in another phase of the battles/war in Afghanistan called Operation Baaz Tsuka. Of course it is with the assistance of NATO. Have you heard of this next operation? Do you think it should be merged with this one, "Panjwaii" or a whole separate/new article? --Arsenous Commodore 22:03, 18 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Baaz Tsuka is Falcon Summit. It is just the same name in the local Afghan language. But as for the merging or seperate article... I was thinking of adding First Battle of Panjwaii, to the heading of the article that is dedicated to Mountain Thrust, Second Battle of Panjwaii to the Medusa section heading, and if the Falcon Summit/ Baaz Tsuka breaks out into heavy combat I would add the third Battle of Panjwaii to the heading for that section as well. I might also create a whole seperate article for Falcon Summit/Baaz Tsuka if the operation deepens the way it is expected to. What do you think of those ideas? --Hellopple 9:15 Atlantic. Dec 18/06

Oops. Yeah you caught me; that was my mistake. I think your idea is a good one. Since this operation is still fresh and we haven't witnessed any large combat, let's keep it from being a separate article for now. In all, I like your plan Hellopple. It be nice to see what others think too though (hope they write) before we go about it I guess.--Arsenous Commodore 21:55, 19 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

I have just created a new article about the operation falcon summit. Part way through though someone else deciided to re-write several parts, clear out several parts and rename the article and give it a re-direct. It took me a while to get it back to normal but it is now. (for the time being) :) --Hellopple 12:35 pm, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

Brilliant job Hellopple. And it only took you a couple of days, I was very impressed to see it and already you attained so much info on the operation even though it's so new. --Arsenous Commodore 17:18, 22 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Slight upgrades and whatnot Hellopple 12 midnight 21 May 07

Has nayone compiled an order of battle for the coalition forces? If so, it shouldld be here, or at least be refernced here.Mikedelsol 10:20, 16 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Should we really list the Governor-General as the main commander of the Canadian Forces? Constitutionally, yes.. but is it good form? On pages in which UK battles are described, is The Queen listed as the primary commander? What about for other nations that have a monarchy? Junius52 (talk) 19:26, 2 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Battle of Panjwaii. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:45, 28 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Civilian toll

edit
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The 'Civilian toll' section contains two contradictory statements:

  • The Battle of Panjwaii was very light on the side of civilian casualties. – It would be better to specify the number of civilian casualties instead of making a subjective judgment that they were "very light".
  • NATO did, however, confirm that a large number of civilians were killed in the attack ... .

I would be grateful if anyone with more knowledge of the topic and relevant sources could resolve this incoherency. Thanks, -- Black Falcon (talk) 00:31, 10 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Battle of Panjwaii. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:41, 16 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Battle_of_Panjwaii&oldid=1195310063"