Talk:Battle of Pleasant Hill
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Battle of Pleasant Hill article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
editNot at all sure that I like the gallery of commanders. Very bulky and doesn't actually contribute much information, IMO. Would have preferred a brief paragraph detailing the units on both sides.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 18:35, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Battle of Pleasant Hill. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080506184217/http://www.nps.gov:80/history/hps/abpp/battles/la019.htm to http://www.nps.gov/history/hps/abpp/battles/la019.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:00, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
47th PA References
editWhy are the references to the 47th PA necessary? There were regiments from Maine and New York at the battle, so it's not like a regiment from the Northeast was unique. Why a full paragraph to talk about their experiences? Isn't that what regimental pages are for? 2601:42:901:BC60:9116:7B46:EDE4:D541 (talk) 02:01, 16 February 2024 (UTC)