Talk:Battle of Princeton/GA1

Latest comment: 15 years ago by Spevw in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch


GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    a (fair representation):   b (all significant views):  
  5. It is stable.
     
  6. It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.
    a (tagged and captioned):   b lack of images (does not in itself exclude GA):   (image is merely a painting but photography was not available in that era. c (non-free images have fair use rationales):  
  7. Overall:
    a Pass:  

Good work! Continue improving article.

Spevw (talk) 23:03, 10 January 2009 (UTC)Reply