Talk:Battle of Rabaul (1942)
Latest comment: 6 years ago by Nick-D in topic Strength figures
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Battle of Rabaul (1942) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on January 23, 2018, January 23, 2020, January 23, 2022, and January 23, 2023. |
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=logo}
Strength figures
editThe "strength" section of the infobox needs fixing by someone who knows the #s. Primergrey (talk) 05:46, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
I blanked the section until it gets fixed. Primergrey (talk) 05:48, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
- The figures for New Britain and the Allied figure for New Ireland are already referenced in the article. If you have a concern with these figures, please explain. Nick-D (talk) 07:20, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
- My concern is that there are New British troop totals on the Japanese side of the box. Primergrey (talk) 07:50, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
- As Rabaul is on New Britain, I don't see why that's a problem? Nick-D (talk) 07:58, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
- My concern is that there are New British troop totals on the Japanese side of the box. Primergrey (talk) 07:50, 23 January 2018 (UTC)