Talk:Battle of Rhode Island

Strategic Outcome

How is the Battle of Rhode Island in fact a British strategic victory? Comte de Rochambeau landed with a substantial infantry force, the French navy was able to retreat to Boston thanks to Greene's stand at the battle, oh yes the British were free to raid the New England coast but what does it matter if both the US - French alliance was saved and Rochambeau and his generals made it on land? Four Leaf Paladin (talk) 14:08, 22 June 2015 (UTC)

Agreed, if anything it should be the contrary, a Tactical victory but indecisive strategically. But I'll leave it as indecisive by now. Frenditor (talk) 04:59, 3 June 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Battle of Rhode Island. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110606115040/http://tps.cr.nps.gov/nhl/detail.cfm?ResourceId=1497&ResourceType=Site to http://tps.cr.nps.gov/nhl/detail.cfm?ResourceId=1497&ResourceType=Site
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120331215527/http://www.jamestownhistoricalsociety.org/index.cfm?id=24 to http://www.jamestownhistoricalsociety.org/index.cfm?id=24

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:29, 28 October 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Battle of Rhode Island. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110606164156/http://tps.cr.nps.gov/nhl/detail.cfm?ResourceId=1191&ResourceType=Building to http://tps.cr.nps.gov/nhl/detail.cfm?ResourceId=1191&ResourceType=Building

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:19, 16 July 2017 (UTC)