Talk:Battle of Roatán

Latest comment: 12 years ago by MathewTownsend in topic GA Review
Good articleBattle of Roatán has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
June 22, 2012Good article nomineeListed
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on January 24, 2010.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the present-day Honduran island of Roatán was the site of a battle in the American War of Independence on March 16, 1782?
On this day...A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on March 16, 2019.

GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Battle of Roatán/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: MathewTownsend (talk · contribs) 13:05, 15 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hi, I'll begin this review shortly! MathewTownsend (talk) 13:05, 15 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Please be advised that my internet connectivity is extremely erratic at the moment because of travel and I may be delayed in responding to the review. Magic♪piano 20:03, 15 June 2012 (UTC)Reply
ok! no worries! MathewTownsend (talk) 20:30, 15 June 2012 (UTC)Reply
review
  • Very nice. Clearly written. I have just one question. I don't understand this sentence: "For logistical and diplomatic reasons, no operations were launched until after the American victory at Yorktown in October 1781 opened the possibility that the British would be able to better defend the area. (Seems like it would be a good time to launch an attack while the British were buy at Yorktown - or am I misunderstanding?) MathewTownsend (talk) 18:43, 17 June 2012 (UTC)Reply
    • The point is that (the Spanish believed) the attack could not be launched earlier: sufficient troops and provisions were not thought to be ready, and there was diplomatic activity between the powers that also played a role in delaying action. The impact of Yorktown was that it spelled the reduction of British troops in North America. The specter of British troops being redeployed from North America to other theaters seems to be what prompted the Spanish to move. I've added some words that I hope clarify this. Magic♪piano 20:24, 19 June 2012 (UTC)Reply
reply
  • But wouldn't the "redeployed" British troops be free to go to the Caribbean? (I'm not quite understanding; perhaps its my poor knowledge of the area's history.)
  • also, "(sometimes also spelled "Rattan")" - perhaps this should go at the beginning of the article?

MathewTownsend (talk) 13:51, 20 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

GA review-see WP:WIAGA for criteria (and here for what they are not)

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose: clear and concise, correct spelling and grammar: 
    B. Complies with MoS for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:  
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. Provides references to all sources:  
    B. Provides in-line citations from reliable sources where necessary:  
    C. No original research:  
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Main aspects are addressed:  
    B. Remains focused:  
  4. Does it follow the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:  
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:  
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:  
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:  
    Pass!