Talk:Battle of Setauket/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Diannaa (talk · contribs) 04:01, 26 November 2011 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

The article is a bit short for a GA, but is well written and illustrated. I did spot checks of the sources and found no errors. Images are all properly licensed. --Good work. --Dianna (talk) 04:18, 26 November 2011 (UTC)

Thank you for your review. I'd try to make the article longer, but I'm afraid it would lose focus if I did so. It's a relatively minor action without long-term consequences... Magic♪piano 19:05, 26 November 2011 (UTC)