Talk:Battle of Sidi Bou Zid
 | This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
 | A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on February 14, 2013, February 14, 2016, February 14, 2017, and February 14, 2018. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Need help!
editI really want to start working in the article but i need some sort of help with the grammar. In the other hand i have some books and a lot of time, if you want to cooperate with me reply here. best wishes. Miguel —Preceding unsigned comment added by 200.62.146.244 (talk) 16:49, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
88mm guns
editArticle used to say that germans shelled The 1st Armored Division with 8.8 cm KwK 43 anti-tank guns, which is obviously wrong as KwK 43 is not an anti-tank gun, but a tank gun, and it was not in use at the time of the battle. The sources state only that 88mm guns were used. I'd say that the guns were FlaKs, but cant find anything to verify this. --UltimateDestroyerOfWorlds (talk) 19:15, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
- Probably meant the PaK43 anti-tank version ofthe KwK. 1812ahill (talk) 14:16, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
Article says 'After being rescued by General George S. Patton's son-in-law, Lieutenant Colonel John K. Waters, who later was held as POW... joined other '. As far as I can find out (the time magazine link says so), Waters WAS Patton's son in law, which is not what is implied in the article. I will amend appropriately.1812ahill (talk) 14:20, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
CE
editDid a tidy-up and made start on citations and references.Keith-264 (talk) 07:32, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
- Recent edits, if anyone wants to discuss the recent edits, remembering WP:civil, please go ahead.Keith-264 (talk) 11:42, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Battle of Sidi Bou Zid. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.historicaltextarchive.com/sections.php?op=viewarticle&artid=190
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070928101834/http://www.americainwwii.com/stories/facingthefox.htm to http://www.americainwwii.com/stories/facingthefox.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:03, 28 October 2016 (UTC)