Talk:Battle of Surabaya (1677)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk · contribs) 11:05, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

Will get to this shortly. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 11:05, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

• Lead and infobox; all good
• Section 1;
  • then routed a much larger royal army sent to suppress them in the October 1676 Battle of Gegodog in northeast Java; this sentence is vague, unable to catch the sense and flow, please reword
• Section 2;
  • landed on 4 and 5 May -> landed on 4–5 May
  • Two VOC detachments – Indonesian companies led by Dutch captains – were sent; use unspaced em dashes
• Section 3; all good
• 9.9% confidence, violation unlikely

Excellent work, Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 11:45, 25 April 2017 (UTC)

@Krishna Chaitanya Velaga: Thanks for the review. I've updated the article in accordance with your comments. Please take another look. HaEr48 (talk) 18:37, 29 April 2017 (UTC)

---

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 15:38, 30 April 2017 (UTC)