Talk:Battle of Trevilian Station
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Opposing forces: Confederate
editRosser's brigade was not Hampton's former command. Hampton's former Brigade consisted of the 1st and 2nd South Carolina, Cobb's Georgia Legion, Phillips Georgia Legion and the Jeff Davis Legion. What source says that Rosser's brigade was Hampton's former command?
--Kitt1987 (talk) 15:02, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
- You are correct and the citations do not support the statement. Thank you for pointing out the error. Hal Jespersen (talk) 18:04, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Battle of Trevilian Station. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050409181912/http://www.cr.nps.gov:80/hps/abpp/battles/va099.htm to http://www.cr.nps.gov/hps/abpp/battles/va099.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050409181912/http://www.cr.nps.gov:80/hps/abpp/battles/va099.htm to http://www.cr.nps.gov/hps/abpp/battles/va099.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:49, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
“Winners and losers”
editThe idea that Wikipedia can announce a winner and a loser to an isolated battle is misguided. This maneuver was merely a part of a larger strategy by Grant which succeeded in quickly defeating the Confederacy. Fielding99 (talk) 03:12, 2 August 2020 (UTC)