Talk:Battle of Xuân Lộc/GA1

Latest comment: 4 years ago by Mztourist in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Gog the Mild (talk · contribs) 17:57, 8 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

  • "File:18thARVNsoldiersatxuanloc by Dirck Halstead.jpg" The source is dead.
  • Image captions which are not sentences should not end in a full stop. (Period.)
  • Cite 5 has something wrong with the formatting - the publisher should not be in italics.

Which variety of English is this written in? Gog the Mild (talk) 17:57, 8 April 2020 (UTC)Reply


I will do some copy editing as go through. As usual shout if I mess anything up.

I may be a little slower than usual in working through this one.

  • "This was the ARVN III Corps' last defensive line of South Vietnam's capital" I suspect a missing word, possibly 'east'.
  • The lead seems to jump a bit chronologically. See here for a suggested rewording. Feel free to edit.
  • The name(s) of the North Vietnamese commander(s) should be in the lead.
  • The "Viet Cong" are named as participants in the infobox, but on a skim I can't see them in the lead nor the main article.

Gog the Mild (talk) 19:35, 9 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

  • "all the provinces in South Vietnam's I and II Corps" This doesn't make sense.
  • "all over the battlefield" Optional: → 'across the country'.
  • "equipped with forty-two artillery guns" Each, or in total?
  • "the 9th Infantry Division commenced their attack" "their" → 'its'.

Got to the end of Prelude. Gog the Mild (talk) 15:41, 12 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

  • "Trần Văn Hương was appointed President, and he was ordered to seek a negotiated peace with North Vietnam at any cost" Ordered by whom?

Mztourist, five last comments or queries. Gog the Mild (talk) 20:28, 15 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Thanks Gog all done. Mztourist (talk) 04:10, 16 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Some of your best work. Promoting. Gog the Mild (talk) 09:33, 16 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Thanks Gog! best regards Mztourist (talk) 10:12, 16 April 2020 (UTC)Reply
Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose ( ) 1b. MoS ( ) 2a. ref layout ( ) 2b. cites WP:RS ( ) 2c. no WP:OR ( ) 2d. no WP:CV ( )
3a. broadness ( ) 3b. focus ( ) 4. neutral ( ) 5. stable ( ) 6a. free or tagged images ( ) 6b. pics relevant ( )
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked   are unassessed