Talk:Battle of the Assunpink Creek/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Hi, I am reviewing this article for GA. It seems to be very well organized and clearly written and referenced. I have noticed only a few small glitches listed in comments below.

Comments

• As the British approached, Fermoy returned to Trenton, drunk. - I believe this is the only mention of Fermoy. He needs some identification as to his role.
• One soldier said "the bridge looked red as blood, with their killed and wounded and their red coats. - there is no closing quotation mark.
• I did a little copy editing and added the cite book format to one of your references.

That's it!

—Mattisse (Talk) 19:55, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

Done.-Kieran4 (talk) 21:13, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

Final GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): Well written b (MoS): Follows MoS

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): Well referenced b (citations to reliable sources): Sources are reliable c (OR): No OR

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): Sets the context b (focused): Remains focused on subject

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias: NPOV

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Very nice article. Congratulations!

—Mattisse (Talk) 21:21, 9 February 2009 (UTC)