Talk:Battle of the Barracks/Archive 1

Fair use rationale for Image:UCK NLA.jpg

Image:UCK NLA.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 11:30, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

Is this article written with a Neutral Point of View

After reading through the article and going through the list of sources used in its writing, I have noticed that the sources are rather one sided. Facts I have access to paint a somewhat different picture of the conflict, however without further research I am not able to make the necessary edits. This article does seem somewhat biased and presents the conflict from a singular point of view. Perhaps an expert could take a look and give his or her opinion? —Preceding unsigned comment added by GreyKer (talk • contribs) 09:32, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

This article is seriously biased and it is really one sided. Some numbers were seriously exaggerated, and some "battles" are missing. Also preface is rather dubious.StDeepBlue (talk) 09:59, 8 July 2011 (UTC)