Talk:Battlefield Airborne Communications Node

Latest comment: 8 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

This article lacks references to support it. It also doesn't seem to be neutral and isn't written in an encyclopedic tone. In fact, it reads more like a brochure or leaflet than an encyclopedia article. Public Menace 22:28, 26 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Response - References have been added and the text has been made more neutral. However, the sections still need to made more coherent and the flow needs to be improved and still more language needs to be neutral to give it a more 'encyclopedic tone'. --140.185.55.87 (talk) 20:56, 19 January 2012 (UTC)Reply
Sorry, but military people talk like that. And many of the references are not in the public domain. --DeknMike (talk) 03:25, 20 January 2012 (UTC)--DeknMike (talk) 03:25, 20 January 2012 (UTC)Reply
This is by far one of the worst articles I've seen on Wikipedia. Not encyclopedic in nature, reads like a brochure, no references to support, original research, disputed neutrality, etc. I could go on. And using the claim "military people talk like that" is not an adequate defense. The articles are supposed to adhere to Wikipedia standards; Wikipedia does not lower its standards to the topic at hand. We can do better than this. Nenorc (talk) 04:59, 19 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

Reference

edit

This Wired article is a good overview of BACN and has lots of links to potential references, if someone wants to work on the article... 86.23.23.244 (talk) 13:09, 13 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 3 external links on Battlefield Airborne Communications Node. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 23:51, 17 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Battlefield Airborne Communications Node. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:57, 28 October 2016 (UTC)Reply