Talk:Baudelaire family

Helena Bonham Carter

Is there a credible source that states that Helena Bonham Carter really did play Beatrice Baudelaire in the film? It seems to be a myth that originated from IMDB's trivia page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.235.152.8 (talk) 12:02, 10 April 2013 (UTC)

Survivor

"Since Beatrice is definitely dead, the survivor of the Baudelaire Mansion fire - if there was one - must have been Mr. Baudelaire."

Not really. At least one other person was present. Lemony Snicket helped Beatrice commit a serious crime, and is wanted for arson. Doesn't all this suggest that Snicket's the survivor? TheMadBaron 19:36, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

Definitely original research, and very tenuous at that. The BBRE strongly suggests it was Olaf there on the day of the fire, so there's a stronger case for him being the survivor.

Mrs. Baudelaire's name

This has been Edited, Because the other comment was Out of Help & unusual, It didn't supported Wikipedia's Post. So its Removed and placed with this one.

Mrs.Baudelaire Name Was Beatrice And she was Part of the REAL V.F.D (Volunteer Fire Department) And was Engaged & love is Lemony Snicket, But she cancelled the marriage and instead married Bertrand. It's Unknown if she is a descend of the Snicket Family.

i Red The Series of Unfortunate Events 1-13 So i deeply know Everything.

Seperate

Shouldn't there be seperate articles on Bertrand, BB1 and BB2? Information about BB1 is scattered between Mr. and Mrs. Baudelaire and this page. Pacaman! 23:28, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

          FUDGE CROW !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.26.211.61 (talk) 23:51, 9 March 2011 (UTC) 

Clean-up

What specifically required clean-up? Mrmoocow 02:54, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

I think Mrs. Baudelaire's section requires cleanup. What should remain here and what should be in the Beatrice article? <3Clamster 04:05, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

Well, I've recently cut down some of Mrs. Baudelaire's section, but it's still extremely long. It's very confusing with what to do, because we have two pages which have sections of the same character, but none that could really be considered the 'main' article. Mrmoocow 05:07, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

In terms of what to do with other article; currently, the section of 'Old Beatrice' on the Beatrice Baudelaire is empty, and the page mostly deals with young (Kit's daughter) Beatrice. I propose this; make 'Beatrice (A Series of Unfortunate Events)', and 'Beatrice Baudelaire' redirect to a disambiguation page, which would link to the separate locations of both the Beatrice. Also, we could give both of them their own page; Beatrice Baudelaire (younger) and Beatrice Baudelaire (older) (older)]]... but then this would mean Bertrand would have his own page, and their really isn't much to say about him. Do you agree? And if we do go through with something like this, what do we do with Bertrand? Mrmoocow 05:07, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

I've made a semi-solution for now. Beatrice Baudelaire is now a disambiguation page, and the information that was there is now just the younger Beatrice, since all older Beatrice information is on this page. Anyway, the Mrs. Baudelaire section has been significantly cut down already. Can the tag be removed? I think all information there is relevant. Mrmoocow 23:41, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

I think the tag can be removed. I like your solution as well. <3Clamster 13:35, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

Hooray! Mrmoocow 22:29, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

Bertrand and Beatrice?

It was agreed here that this article should stay at Mr. and Mrs. Baudelaire, so why's it been moved back again without debate? 217.42.64.91 16:43, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Beatricesnicket.jpg

Image:Beatricesnicket.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 06:56, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Images

Comment moved from Talk:Baudelaire family/Comments. Astronaut (talk) 17:01, 13 November 2009 (UTC)

I think its great but student from all over the world have book talks and they choose to do one of the books from the series and part of the project might include pictures of the characters so in my opion you should post pictures of all chracters including Sir from book four. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.34.117.53 (talk) 20:43, 15 October 2009

Unfortunately, copyright would be a problem. Astronaut (talk) 17:01, 13 November 2009 (UTC)

This post is removed. BAUDELAIRES ARE NOT JEWISH & ARE NOT OF ANY RELIGION.

Thanks,

- Wikipedia Ultimate Helper -

The GOCEreviewed template

The article is pretty sparse so I don't think a copy-edit is appropriate. I tried to summarize information from the main articles of the characters, but I couldn't really find too much to summarize. I cut a lot of overly detailed paragraphs from the article, including the fire, the mansion, and the poison darts. I felt they made the article too confusing and is better handled if the entire sections were just directly stated. While I won't question the notability of the individual members, I'm skeptical about the notability of the family itself. A reception section is needed. And more references too. I will be watching the page. ~Cheers, TenTonParasol 00:12, 4 July 2012 (UTC)

Oh! And some production, if that's possible. Currently, one-third of the concept and creation section is devoted to the real-life origins of the surname Baudelaire, which I'm not entirely sure is relevant to this article. ~Cheers, TenTonParasol 00:13, 4 July 2012 (UTC)