Wikipedia

Talk:Bauhaus in Budapest

Latest comment: 5 years ago by JSoos in topic fundamental problem

Bauhaus in Budapest - started Tamas Szabo 05:01, 5 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

fundamental problem

edit
Latest comment: 5 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Tamas, this is a very good page, thank you for your work and for contributing it. I have only one issue with it -- the title, and the references to "Bauhaus" as a short name for German architectural modernism.

Ernst May, Bruno Taut, Peter Behrens, the Deutscher Werkbund, Mendelsohn, Scharoun and a lot of other significant German-speaking architects in the 1920s responded to the same issues and possibilities as the Bauhaus. Most of that came before the founding of the Bauhaus architecture program in 1925. Walter Gropius was only one of sixteen architects invited to the Weissenhofsiedlung -- and in no way was the Stuttgart exhibition 'inspired' by Bauhaus activity.

There's a tendency to lump all this style under the well-known Bauhaus "brand name", which is inaccurate. The better name for this movement would be Neues Bauen, which is how it was called in Germany at the time. Most people know it as Bauhaus, I realize. --Lockley 23:58, 16 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Hallo Lockley, thank you for your helpfull extentions. My intention for the title "Bauhaus in Budapest" is the (may be not correct) use "Tourism Office of Budapest" as a important sight place in Budapest (see 3 external links / at External information). I can not change the title, but you can explain in the article. I think you ar the specialist in this area.
Can you build in the article your helpfull extentions? The title is given by (maybe bad) habits. I hope, that visitors like the information in this page. Thanks Tamas Szabo 14:33, 17 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

More problems

edit

There is a fake knowledge in this article: what is Bauhaus. There were very few architects in Budapest (3-4) who really was member of Bauhaus, and the names are missing. However between the two WWs many modernist, minimalist, functionalist, constructivist building was built. Differences and similarities of these are not shown in the article, mixing these all, not discussing the influence of Bauhaus school or other contemporary movements (e.g. soviet architecture) on the buildings built that time, the industrial possibilities of Hungary (e.g. portland cement vs aluminate cements, etc.) . The focus of the period, is also missing from the article (and the title), also not in context of other styles existing in the same period. The specific buildings shown in the article seems to be selected randomly: most famous? mostly visited by tourists? Own research? I even think this article would be better to delete, I do not see sound concept behind the article just seems to be based on webpages of popular touristic tours visiting these buildings. JSoos (talk) 11:45, 3 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Bauhaus in Budapest. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:11, 29 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Bauhaus in Budapest. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:40, 9 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Add topic
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Bauhaus_in_Budapest&oldid=1199660813"