Talk:Baxstrom v. Herold
Latest comment: 3 years ago by 2601:500:8300:399:5923:AC28:C08E:D09B in topic Wildly incorrect holding
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Wildly incorrect holding
editI don't have time at the present to update the accuracy of this article, but it is wildly inaccurate. This case has absolutely nothing to do with the Double Jeopardy Clause, but instead it has to do with the Equal Protection Clause under the Fourteenth Amendment (see the ref in the article itself). Marking it as disputed for assistance. 2601:500:8300:399:5923:AC28:C08E:D09B (talk) 01:58, 1 February 2021 (UTC)