Talk:Baxter v Commissioners of Taxation (NSW)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Baxter v Commissioners of Taxation (NSW) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Australia: Law Low‑importance

	Australia portal Baxter v Commissioners of Taxation (NSW) is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian law (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Improvements

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The article would be improved by reference to the position of income taxes after the Engineers' case, the Payroll tax case particularly the judgment of Barwick CJ at [26], and to the superannuation surcharge considered in Austin v Commonwealth. Find bruce (talk) 00:16, 8 December 2016 (UTC)Reply