Talk:Bay Village, Boston

raising street level

Is it really 12-18 feet or 12-18 inches in the sentence below from the article?

"During the mid to late 1800s, some streets in Bay Village were raised 12-18 feet as the South End and Back Bay were created by continued landfill" —Preceding unsigned comment added by 387mqr (talk • contribs) 10:22, 25 May 2009 (UTC)

Yes, really, the historical signs in the area say so. SethTisue (talk) 13:41, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

unknown or not known as a separate neighborhood?

In my experience, most people think that the area officially recognized as Bay Village is part of the South End. Thus, the area is not "unknown" but misidentified. 75.150.74.243 (talk) 04:42, 12 October 2010 (UTC)Larry Siegel

Smallest or not?

This page says that Bay Village is the second smallest of the neighborhoods in Boston, while Neighborhoods in Boston says that it is the smallest. Which is it? 24.218.145.110 (talk) 23:16, 2 November 2012 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Bay Village, Boston. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20061201053141/http://www.bayvillage.net:80/neighborhood/bv_map.htm to http://www.bayvillage.net/neighborhood/bv_map.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 14:25, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Bay Village, Boston. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110928080000/https://www.bayvillage.net/category/events/upcoming/ to https://www.bayvillage.net/category/events/upcoming/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110723024947/https://www.bayvillage.net/neighborhood/ to http://www.bayvillage.net/neighborhood/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121026133552/http://www.boston.com/news/globe/ideas/brainiac/2007/04/_a_globe_reader.html to http://www.boston.com/news/globe/ideas/brainiac/2007/04/_a_globe_reader.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:14, 29 October 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bay Village, Boston. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061201053141/http://www.bayvillage.net/neighborhood/bv_map.htm to http://www.bayvillage.net/neighborhood/bv_map.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:18, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bay Village, Boston. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110720074025/http://www.cityofboston.gov/Images_Documents/BeaconHill_BayVillage_brochure_tcm3-19113.pdf to http://www.cityofboston.gov/Images_Documents/BeaconHill_BayVillage_brochure_tcm3-19113.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:53, 16 July 2017 (UTC)

No one

Has the slightest idea of where the places you mention, let alone the main topic of the article, are. I gather they're somewhere in Boston.

For literally the many dozenth time, I came to Wiki to see the most basic possible element of a factual presentation, and it's missing. After the article's been online for 16 years.

A map.

And just in case that word is unclear to you: one which shows the complete, official, enclosing boundary lines of the neighborhood. You should also label thereon every, or at least most, places and things you mention.

At the same time, I find Wikipedia's grading and editorial banners not always accurate. To me the article looks solid enough to warrant a 'B', not 'C', grade.

Jimlue (talk) 01:36, 9 May 2022 (UTC)