 | Bayard's Cove Fort has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: September 9, 2016. (Reviewed version). |
| This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg)
Untitled
editCan you clarify - is it cover fort or cover fort as botrh are written here 217.205.224.155 (talk) 11:47, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
GA Review
edit| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Bayard's Cove Fort/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Ian Rose (talk · contribs) 04:16, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
Starting review... Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 04:16, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
Toolbox checks -- No dab, EL or copyvio issues noted.
Prose/structure -- Minor copyedit but no concerns.
Content -- Was this actually a Device Fort? It's categorised as such, and that might well be correct if it was started in Henry's reign, but no explicit mention/ref in the text stating that.
Referencing -- Look reliable and no formatting issues noted.
Images -- Licensing looks okay. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 04:50, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
- Good spot on the category - had copied it over by mistake! Thanks Ian. Hchc2009 (talk) 06:11, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
- No prob, passing now. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 06:26, 9 September 2016 (UTC)