| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Bayezid II article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This  level-5 vital article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg)
 | You can help expand this article with text translated from the corresponding article in Turkish. Click [show] for important translation instructions.
|
Ahmet defeats Karaman?
editIt reads: Ahmed, the older of the two claimants, had won a battle against the Karaman Turks. It this claimed sourced ? Ahmet was in early teens when the realm of Karaman was incorporated into Ottoman Empire. I'll call the editor. Nedim Ardoğa (talk) 13:51, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
- Another comment:It is claimed that Selim returned from Crimea and, with support from the Janissaries, defeated and killed Ahmed. Bayezid II then abdicated the throne to Selim (The author is ambigious.) The timeline is incorrect. I'll fix it. Nedim Ardoğa (talk) 12:47, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Death of Cem?
editUnder "Fights for the throne" the article states "Cem was left to languish and die in a Neapolitan prison." This does not correlate to the Wikipedia article on Cem, which says he died "in Capua on February 25, 1495, while on a military expedition to conquer Naples under the command of King Charles VIII of France." These differing accounts should be fact-checked and corrected. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bugsi (talk • contribs) 15:46, 18 June 2011 (UTC)
Article is biased and engages in apologetics of the Ottoman Empire
editThis article is written in a non-critical fashion and does not attempt to establish the balance between those who opposed the Ottoman colonization, and the Ottoman state. Great deal of effort is made to highlight the Sultan's supposed charity to the Jews and Muslims of Spain, but, for example, no mention is made of the fact that they had been in Spain to begin with - highlighting that Kingdom's tolerance up to that point. As well, the document focuses on official Ottoman document that tend to propagandize their actions and often write in an epic style after the fact highlighting the charity of the Turks, which is repeated here.
It is ironic that no mention of is made of Bayezid's famous legal reforms in which he reduced the criminal penalties for Christians who failed to pay their much-higher taxes than the Muslim population which they had to pay communally (if 1500 people lived in a village, and 500 ran away, the 1000 remaining had to pay the full 1500 amount). Bayezid says he would reduce the penalties, but not the taxes, and that "so the taxpayer doesn't die completely." This sarcastic statement in which he mocks them, essentially saying 'They're almost dead, if they die, we'll collect less tax, so the reform is not to make it easier on them, it's to make sure we get paid, is astonishingly used to make the case that Bayezid helped the Christians. Apologists should try and make a point that Christians in the Balkans continued being subject to the theft of their male children, which was an act of genocide, something also done to the Armenians in a different way much later. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.85.236.12 (talk) 09:23, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
Spanish Inquisition?
editThe sentence "In July 1492, the new state of Spain expelled its Jewish and Muslim populations as part of the Spanish Inquisition" mixes topics in a very inaccurate way. The Jews were expelled from Castille and Aragon in 1492 (Alhambra Decree) but this is not "part of" the Inquisition since the Spanish Inquisition had jurisdiction only over baptized members of the Church (e.g. converts). Muslims were not expelled in 1492. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Raulgh (talk • contribs) 12:56, 22 November 2022 (UTC)