Talk:Bcl-2

Latest comment: 8 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified
edit

I removed the paragraph entitled 'Bim' because it seemed to be extraneous info and didn't make a lot of sense. Reference link was also incorrect. Don't think one member of the family should get its own paragraph if no others do. Berry 15:05, 26 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

I changed MMP to MOMP because 1) MOMP is standard in the literature, and 2) MMP is the common abbreviation for the matrix metalloproteinases. I removed PT (permeability transition) because 1) PTP is the more common abbreviation, and 2) it wasn't used anywhere else in the article anyway. EquationDoc 02:00, 9 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Added links for Bak, Bax, and Bcl-xL in "Function". Deleted "MOM" because this abbreviation is irrelevant in the text. Changed the "believed" mechanism for Bcl-2 regulation of the mitochondrial outer membrane permeabilization for the latest available information regarding the oligomerization of Bax and/or Bak to form a pore in the outer membrane, as well as its blocking by Bcl-2, thus eliminating the vague MOMP concept. Pablufu 11:10, 02 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

At some point I'd like to break this page into two, one describing the Bcl-2 protein, and one describing the Bcl-2 family of proteins (say, Bcl-2_Proteins), thus opening up the possibility for individual pages for each of the 25 or so Bcl-2 proteins. EquationDoc 02:00, 9 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Format/Editing/Citations

edit

I feel that there are some serious weaknesses in this article-- for example, there is an in-text citation in the paragraph of Bcl-2 and the role it plays in cancer, and the citation is for a study that is almost 20 years old, and extremely obsolete. I feel that this is poor research, and I do not feel comfortable editing it since I have only undergraduate experience with molecular biology. Can someone with more experience in the field take a look at the information and take a try at editing it?--Nakedophelia 22:51, 15 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

The figure showing the domain structure/organization is not correct. Mcl-1 (and probably A1 as well as others) does not possess a BH4 domain (Bcl-2 does however). See the domains contained in Mcl-1 here: http://www.ebi.ac.uk/interpro/ISpy?mode=single&ac=Q07820 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 35.9.6.175 (talk) 14:06, 18 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Proposed merger

edit

Concerning the proposed merger of Apoptosis regulator proteins, Bcl-2 family into this article:

Proposed split (from 2010?)

edit
I am trying to clean up long standing split tags. I do not have the subject knowlege to deal with this article. If the split is really required then can someone be brave and do it or else can the tag be removed? Op47 (talk) 15:34, 27 December 2011 (UTC)Reply
No longer clear what that old split proposal was. - but see below - Rod57 (talk) 14:46, 13 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

Proposed split out of Targeted therapies as BCL-2 inhibitor

edit

I reproposed a split in Dec 2015 (apparently not having seen Op47s comment above) - Since this is an active area (and now the FDA has approved the first) I'll do this split (by moving content to the current redirect) as soon as I get time if no one does first. - Rod57 (talk) 14:46, 13 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

@Rod57: In favor. 02:41, 5 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Normal physiological role?

edit

This article is in a bit of a shocking state! Nothing whatsoever about the normal physiological roles, or the biochemistry and signalling pathways involved in Bcl-2 function? Yes it's important in cancer, but there's much more to this protein. Might start an improvement on this soon. I must be fair and say that this is not just article, most protein articles give undue weight to human pathophysiological conditions, rather than normal physiology or non-human information. Fgf10 (talk) 10:46, 17 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Bcl-2. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:17, 29 October 2016 (UTC)Reply