Talk:Beach Boys Concert

Incomplete Tracklist?

It looks like this tracklist is incomplete. Amazon shows 20 tracks.[1] Also, the article references papa oom mow mow, but doesnt mention it on the tracklist. --Nick 03:25, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

- The tracklist is for the original pressed recording release. The Amazon album features recordings from their 1968 London tour. Papa-oom-mow-mow doesn't appear on this album.

Other versions

I had another version of this album with fewer tracks that was realeased on Pickwick and titiled Wow, Great Concert! googuse 20:23, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:BBConcertCover.jpg

Image:BBConcertCover.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 00:59, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:BBConcertCover.jpg

Image:BBConcertCover.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 21:32, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

Rated importance as 'High and rerated class to 'Start'

Album charted #1 for four weeks, so thats at least a 'high' importance. It was unrated previously in that department. It is better than a stub in my view, so it goes to 'Start' class. Work obviously needed to move any further. Jusdafax (talk) 02:37, 27 February 2009 (UTC)