Talk:Bean Station, Tennessee/GA2

Latest comment: 3 years ago by Whiteguru in topic GA Reassessment

GA Reassessment

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Starts GA Reassessment. The reassessment will follow the same sections of the Article.   Thank you --

 

Instructions: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Good_article_reassessment


Observations

edit
   HTML document size: 276 kB
   Prose size (including all HTML code): 40 kB
   References (including all HTML code): 120 kB
   Wiki text: 62 kB
   Prose size (text only): 22 kB (3551 words) "readable prose size"
   References (text only): 15 kB
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  • Article is well laid out; Infobox is quite the informative data
  1. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):   d (copyvio and plagiarism):  
  • The Lede is a little bit lean and sparse, given the history of this location.  Y
  • Reference 3 is dead; it is on the Archive.org site.  Y
  • Reference 8 is a dead link and indicates new data will be available anon;  Y
  • Reference 12 is a most interesting read.
  • Demographics - is the 2010 Census the latest information available?
      Resolved
  1. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  • I am surprised that the construction of the Cherokee Dam - where 87% of the existing population were forced to move by way of eminent domain, is not mentioned in the Lede.  Y
  1. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  • NPOV is preserved in this article.
  1. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  • Page created 23 May 2005
  • Page has 657 edits from 153 editors
  • 90 day page views = 5,534 with an average of 59 reads per day
  • Internet Archive bot has visited 2 times
  • GreenC bot has been on the page 6 times (repairing archive links)
  • Page received 350 edits in 2020 ...
  • Page history shows steady improvement; page considered stable
  1. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  • File:Main Street West - Bean Station.jpg = Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International license.
  • File:Bean StationTNSeal.png = Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International license.
  • https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bean_Station,_Tennessee#/map/0 = Wikimedia Maps, Open Street Map
  • File:USA Tennessee location map.svg = Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported license.
  • File:Street intersection - NARA - 281459 (colorized).jpg = Public domain, Title 17, Chapter 1, Section 105 of the US Code.
  • File:Old Bean Station Inn = Public domain, Title 17, Chapter 1, Section 105 of the US Code.
  • File:Peavine Railroad trestle bridge.jpg = Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International license.
  • File:View of town - NARA - 280421 cropped cleaned colorized.jpg = Public domain, Title 17, Chapter 1, Section 105 of the US Code.
  • File:Old Bean Station site 2021.jpg = Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International license.
  • File:Bean Station municipal limit signage.jpg = Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication.
  • File:East Tennessee Crossing - Battle of Bean Station Re-enactment - NARA - 7718106.jpg = Public domain, Title 17, Chapter 1, Section 105 of the US Code.
  • Images all appropriately licensed and tagged.
  1. Notifying Editors:
  • Page Creator HollyAm (has not contributed since October 2013)
  • Editor AppalachianCentrist
  • Editor Magnolia677
  • Editor ACase0000
  • Editor BrineStans
  • Editor Bneu2013
  • Editor Fettlemap
  • A total of six involved editors were able to be notified.

  1. Overall:
  • Quite an interesting history of Bean station, well written and well laid out, although the Lede is a little spare.
  • This reassessment has been occasioned by a 'drive by' GA review; the article is likely to keep this status if we can attend to the minor issues raised above. --Whiteguru (talk) 07:55, 16 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

 

  Passed