Talk:Beautiful Garbage/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Coemgenus (talk · contribs) 15:01, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

I'll review this over the next few days. --Coemgenus (talk) 15:01, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

Checklist

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Comments

• In general, this looks very good. Citations, stability, NPOV, and breadth of coverage are all good. Images are all fair use, and I think the fair use rationales are appropriate.
• The "World tour" section has some issues with tense. At time it sounds like you're writing as if the tour is ongoing.
• "Critical reception" has the same problem in places. ("He adds" rather than "he added," for example.)
• There are some one-sentence paragraphs in the last section that could probably be combined.

Coemgenus, all three done. Lapadite (talk) 04:02, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

I made a few more minor changes, but I think there's nothing else that needs fixing. Great article, I'm happy to promote it. --Coemgenus (talk) 13:12, 29 January 2015 (UTC)