Talk:Beautiful Store
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
This article is currently the subject of an educational assignment. Further details are available here. |
Beautiful Store received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article. |
About the beginning of May or the middle of May, we are going to translate all the information in ko:Wikipedia (Beautiful store 아름다운 가게)
And then, find more information in Beautiful store's website etc after translating all contents in ko:Wikipedia.
- You should be doing this RIGHT NOW. At the beginning of May you are supposed to be done, with the article in the process of review by the Wikipedia community. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 04:00, 19 April 2013 (UTC)
Updated to do list
We are contents is Beautiful store. First of all ,find more information in Beautiful store's website etc after translating all contents in ko:Wikipedia. And then we plus the contents and uploading the image.
Our Content`s are like this
1 Beautiful store
2 About Beautiful store
3 Introduce
4 History
5 Meaning of Beautiful Store
6 Effect of Beautiful Store
7 Extend of Beautiful Store
8 criticism of Beautiful Store
9 Reference
Also divided our role.
User:GaHee Park : Translation and writing about history of beautiful store, Meaning of Beautiful Store
editUser:Sujinkim : Writing about introduce, Extend of Beautiful Store, Extend of Beautiful Store
editUser:HaeYoon : Writing about history of beautiful store, Effect of Beautiful Store
editAnd we will visit the beautiful store this week, we take some picture and uploading to our article. We will be finished our writing due to April 30.
Instructor review
editWhat this article needs most at this point is copyediting for grammar, and restructuring the content into subsections. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 06:41, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
Content Removal
editApologies for the lack of detail in removing the content. The previous version of the article had been written more like a company brochure than a wikipedia article, presenting unnecessary company website information.
e.g. Introduction of sharing project - I removed this section as the pictures is an unnecessary detail that doesnt seem to fit the article. None of it is notable or verifiable really. they even wrote down their opening times, it came off more like an ad than a wiki article.
Reduced the History to the important things worth mentioning. I see the article has been further edited with titles removed, so doesn't seem to be much more one could write about this store thats really worth noting, pending some better references. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Peterfen (talk • contribs) 06:47, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Beautiful Store. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130512184248/http://www.beautifulstore.org/Intro/Business/Intro.aspx to http://www.beautifulstore.org/Intro/Business/Intro.aspx
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:56, 29 October 2016 (UTC)