CSD

edit

This article was NOT created as spam nor advertisement. I should know, I created it as I felt it was a notable company due to the various magazines it has created, and as a tie in to the former Neopets magazines. BeckettMedia did send someone who spammed two links, which were quickly removed. The article is otherwise neutral and not an advertisement. And all COI edits are reverted on sight. I see no reason to speedy this notable company because of one reverted edit. -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 16:26, 18 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thanks. I meant to come back to this one ages ago and work on it. I'll spend some time today to try and get it fleshed out and find some non-primary sources. -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 16:31, 18 September 2008 (UTC)Reply
Your word's good here, Collect! But the darned thing needs some third-party reliable sources pretty badly; and there's not much evidence of notability outside of what they claim to put out. --Orange Mike | Talk 16:32, 18 September 2008 (UTC)Reply
Understandable. I see lots of placing calling them the authority on baseball cards, and they have published a huge number of books, but finding a way to put it in the article is tricky. Got a little history in it, though, and will work on it some more later. :) -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 18:45, 18 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

time to update? defunct magazines.

edit

Might be time to update the article soon. Various magazine mentioned in article not at Beckett website. Have posted a tweet asking Beckett which of their magazines are still going. --EarthFurst (talk) 07:04, 5 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion

edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 05:21, 15 April 2019 (UTC)Reply